How creatine affects performance and recovery for running, OCR, and endurance sports
Thomas Solomon, PhD.
Updated onReading time approx 7 minutes (1400 words).
What you’ll learn:
Creatine is an amino acid–derived compound your body uses to help recycle cellular energy (ATP).
Taking creatine daily is very likely to boost maximal strength, reps-to-failure that last under about 3 minutes, and all-out speed efforts up to roughly 30 seconds.
Creatine is unlikely to improve endurance performance like time trials or time-to-exhaustion runs.
There’s early evidence suggesting that creatine might help short-term memory and reasoning, but we need more studies.
Curious about the how and why? Scroll down for the details, the nuances, and the nerdy bits.
What is creatine?
Creatine is a naturally occurring compound your body makes from the amino acids arginine and glycine. It isn’t built into proteins and it isn’t coded by your genes. Instead, creatine helps your cells manage energy, and about 95% of it lives in your muscles.
Your body makes some creatine from the amino acids, arginine and glycine, but also breaks it down to creatinine, which you pee out. That means you also need creatine from food to keep levels topped up. Eating meat (inc. red meat, chicken, pork, etc.), fish (e.g., salmon), and seafood can provide it. If you don’t eat those foods, supplements can fill the gap because creatine in supplements is chemically synthesised and not extracted from meat (and, strict plant-based folks can simply choose a plant-based capsule).
During exercise, your muscles chew through adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is the cell’s “energy coin”. At very high power outputs, ATP from carbohydrate and fat isn’t made fast enough. That’s where phosphocreatine (PCr) comes in. Breaking down PCr into creatine (Cr) frees a phosphate molecule (Pi) that helps rebuild ATP quickly — basically a nitro button for brief, all-out efforts.
ATP hydrolysis: ATP → ADP + Pi + H+
ATP resynthesis: PCr → Cr + Pi then ADP + Pi → ATP
So if your muscles hold more creatine, you can produce more phosphocreatine and resupply ATP faster during maximal-effort, anaerobic or sprint-type work. Because daily creatine supplementation increases muscle creatine levels, creatine has become one of the most studied — and most popular — sports supplements. So…
What is the scientific evidence on creatine’s impact on athletic performance?
Creatine supplementation is safe for most people. That said, folks with asthma, immune dysfunction, and/or kidney or liver conditions, should consult their doctor before considering a creatine supplement.
Creatine does not improve training-related gains in endurance performance (for example, time trials or time-to-exhaustion). In fact, one meta-analysisA meta-analysis quantifies the overall effect size of a treatment by compiling effect sizes from all known studies of that treatment. even reports small reductions in the training-induced improvements in V̇O2maxV̇O2max is the maximal rate of oxygen consumption your body can achieve during exercise. It is a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness and indicates the size of your engine, i.e., your maximal aerobic power, which contributes to endurance performance. (small effect sizeAn effect size is a quantitative measure of the magnitude of a relationship or difference between groups in a study. Unlike p-values, effect sizes show how large or meaningful that effect is. Common effect size measures include Cohen’s d, Hedges’ g, eta-squared, and correlation coefficients.).
Creatine improves gains in maximal strength and in sets taken to failure that last under about 3 minutes (small to moderate effect sizes).
Creatine improves high-intensity “anaerobic” performance, such as 30-second Wingate tests (large effect sizes).
In older adults (60 and older), combining creatine with strength training helps preserve muscle mass (large effect sizes), muscle strength (small to moderate), and functional ability (for example, chair sit-to-stand; large) more than training alone — a handy add-on for healthy ageing.
Early evidence suggests creatine might help short-term memory and reasoning in healthy people (Avgerinos et al. 2018). However, further randomised controlled trials are needed, especially in older populations, to make firm conclusions.
Some studies note more stomach upset when caffeine and creatine are taken together, and chronic caffeine during a creatine loading phase might blunt creatine’s benefits (although the acute effect of caffeine seems intact). However, better trials are needed to fully map the caffeine-creatine interactions.
Because meat contains creatine, people who avoid meat may have lower muscle creatine levels. Fortunately, creatine supplementation raises muscle creatine and improves high-intensity performance in plant-based eaters too. And again, the creatine in supplements is synthesised, not taken from meat; plant-based eaters might just want to ensure a capsulated creatine product uses a plant-based capsule.
If you choose to use creatine, a reasonable dose that increases muscle levels of creatine is:
A loading phase of 5 grams of creatine monohydrate, 4 times per day for 5 to 7 days, then a maintenance dose of 3 to 5 grams per day. Note: These doses reliably raise muscle creatine and improve performance in studies.
Or skip loading and take 3 grams per day for 28 days. Note: This slower approach still raises muscle creatine, just later.
Taking more doesn’t necessarily mean a bigger effect, but some studies show that larger athletes may need to ingest up to 5 to 10 grams per day to maintain creatine stores.
When supplementation is stopped, muscle creatine levels usually return to baseline levels in around 4 to 6 weeks.
Can creatine enhance athletic performance?
Taking a daily creatine supplement alongside regular training is likely to improve performance during maximal strength and reps-to-failure tasks, and during high-intensity/maximal speed-based efforts lasting up to about 30 seconds.
The effect sizeAn effect size is a standardized measure of the magnitude of an effect of an intervention. Unlike p-values, effect sizes show how large the effect is and indicate how meaningful it might be. Common effect size measures include standardised mean difference (SMD), Cohen’s d, Hedges’ g, eta-squared, and correlation coefficients. is medium to large.
The effect appears to be similar between trained athletes and untrained folks.
The effect appears to be larger in males; however, this is probably due to a lack of widespread research in females rather than a lack of a biological effect. Further high-quality creatine research in females is needed!
Meanwhile, supplementation with creatine is unlikely to improve endurance performance — it may even blunt training-induced gains in V̇O2max.
These conclusions are based on a moderate quality of evidenceA moderate quality of evidence means that, in general, studies in this field have some limitations. This could be due to somewhat inconsistent effects between studies, a moderate range of effect sizes between studies, and/or a moderate risk of bias (caused by a small to medium number of studies, small to medium numbers of participants, partially described randomization processes, some missing data, some inappropriate methods/statistics). When the quality of evidence is moderate, there is some doubt and only moderate confidence in the overall effect of an intervention, and future studies could change overall conclusions. The best way to improve the quality of evidence is for scientists to conduct large, well-controlled, high-quality randomized controlled trials.: there’s a large number of reasonably well-designed yet small studies and the effects are fairly consistent between studies (low to moderate heterogeneity/variability)Heterogeneity shows how much the results in different studies in a meta-analysis vary from each other. It is measured as the percentage of variation (the I2 value). A rule of thumb: if I2 is roughly 25%, that indicates low heterogeneity (good), 50% is moderate, and 75% indicates high heterogeneity (bad). High heterogeneity means there’s more variability in effects between studies and, therefore, a less precise overall effect estimate.. So, there’s a moderate level of confidence that the overall effect sizes reported in meta-analysesA meta-analysis quantifies the overall effect size of a treatment by compiling effect sizes from all known studies of that treatment. reflect the true effect of creatine.
To minimise the risk of consuming a supplement that contains prohibited substances, only choose products that have been independently tested (e.g., Informed Sport). And, remember: Supplements do not make athletes and do not replace training; they're just the icing on a very well-baked cake. Before reaching for pills and potions, optimise your training load and dial in your sleep, nutrition, and rest.
How to use this: If your goal is sprint speed, repeated surges, or strength, consider creatine monohydrate. Either load with 5 grams, 4 times per day for 5 to 7 days, then take 3 to 5 grams daily; or skip loading and take 3 grams daily for 28 days. Be consistent, watch how your gut feels if you also use caffeine, and if you stop, expect muscle creatine levels to drift back to baseline over about 4 to 6 weeks.
Strengthen the fight for clean sport
Remember: You are the only person responsible for what goes in your body! Ignorance is not an excuse! Stay educated. Be informed.
Consult WADA’s prohibited list, cross-check your meds against the Global DRO drug reference list, and only choose supplements that have been tested by an independent body (e.g., Informed Sport or LabDoor).
Full list of meta-analyses examining creatine for performance.
Here are the meta-analyses I've summarised above:
The Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Upper- and Lower-Body Strength and Power: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Kazeminasab et al. (2025) Nutrients.
Does Creatine Supplementation Enhance Performance in Active Females? A Systematic Review. Tam et al. (2025) Nutrients.
The Effect of Creatine Supplementation on Resistance Training-Based Changes to Body Composition: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Desai et al. (2024) J Strength Cond Res.
Creatine supplementation protocols with or without training interventions on body composition: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Pashayee-Khamene et al. (2024) J Int Soc Sports Nutr.
The Effects of Creatine Supplementation Combined with Resistance Training on Regional Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Ryan Burke, Alec Piñero, Max Coleman, Adam Mohan, Max Sapuppo, Francesca Augustin, Alan A Aragon, Darren G Candow, Scott C Forbes, Paul Swinton, Brad J Schoenfeld. Nutrients (2023)
Effects of Creatine Monohydrate on Endurance Performance in a Trained Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Julen Fernández-Landa, Asier Santibañez-Gutierrez, Nikola Todorovic, Valdemar Stajer, Sergej M Ostojic. Sports Med (2023)
Effectiveness of Creatine in Metabolic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arturo P Jaramillo, Luisa Jaramillo, Javier Castells, Andres Beltran, Neyla Garzon Mora, Sol Torres, Gabriela Carolina Barberan Parraga, Maria P Vallejo, Yurianna Santos. Cureus (2023)
Short-Term Creatine Supplementation and Repeated Sprint Ability-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mark Glaister, Lauren Rhodes. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab (2022)
Efficacy of Alternative Forms of Creatine Supplementation on Improving Performance and Body Composition in Healthy Subjects: A Systematic Review. Carly Fazio, Craig L Elder, Margaret M Harris. J Strength Cond Res (2022)
The Paradoxical Effect of Creatine Monohydrate on Muscle Damage Markers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Kenji Doma, Akhilesh Kumar Ramachandran, Daniel Boullosa & Jonathan Connor. Sports Med (2022)
Interaction Between Caffeine and Creatine When Used as Concurrent Ergogenic Supplements: A Systematic Review. Sara Elosegui, Jaime López-Seoane, María Martínez-Ferrán, Helios Pareja-Galeano. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab (2022)
Effects of creatine and caffeine ingestion in combination on exercise performance: A systematic review. Alisson H Marinho, Jaqueline S Gonçalves, Palloma K Araújo, Adriano E Lima-Silva, Thays Ataide-Silva, Gustavo G de Araujo. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr (2021)
Creatine supplementation and VO2 max: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Damien Gras, Charlotte Lanhers, Reza Bagheri, Fred Dutheil. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr (2021)
The Effect of Creatine Supplementation on Markers of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Intervention Trials. Northeast B, Clifford T. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab (2021)
Benefits of Creatine Supplementation for Vegetarians Compared to Omnivorous Athletes: A Systematic Review. Kaviani M, Shaw K, Chilibeck PD. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2020)
The Additive Effects of Creatine Supplementation and Exercise Training in an Aging Population: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Stares A, Bains M. J Geriatr Phys Ther (2020)
Effect of the Combination of Creatine Monohydrate Plus HMB Supplementation on Sports Performance, Body Composition, Markers of Muscle Damage and Hormone Status: A Systematic Review. Fernández-Landa J, Calleja-González J, León-Guereño P, Caballero-García A, Córdova A, Mielgo-Ayuso J. Nutrients (2019)
Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Athletics Performance in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mielgo-Ayuso J, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Marqués-Jiménez D, Caballero-García A, Córdova A, Fernández-Lázaro D. Nutrients (2019)
Effects of creatine supplementation on cognitive function of healthy individuals: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Konstantinos I Avgerinos, Nikolaos Spyrou, Konstantinos I Bougioukas, Dimitrios Kapogiannis. Exp Gerontol (2018)
Creatine Supplementation and Upper Limb Strength Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lanhers C, Pereira B, Naughton G, Trousselard M, Lesage FX, Dutheil F. Sports Med (2017)
Creatine Supplementation and Lower Limb Strength Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Lanhers C, Pereira B, Naughton G, Trousselard M, Lesage FX, Dutheil F. Sports Med (2015)
Creatine supplementation and aging musculoskeletal health. Candow DG, Chilibeck PD, Forbes SC. Endocrine (2014)
Creatine supplementation during resistance training in older adults-a meta-analysis. Devries MC, Phillips SM. Med Sci Sports Exerc (2014)
Effect of creatine supplementation on body composition and performance: a meta-analysis. Branch JD. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab (2003)
Does oral creatine supplementation improve strength? A meta-analysis. Dempsey RL, Mazzone MF, Meurer LN. J Fam Pract (2002)
Creatine supplementation as an ergogenic aid for sports performance in highly trained athletes: a critical review. Mujika I, Padilla S. Int J Sports Med (1997)
Photo of pyramid by Eugene Tkachenko on Unsplash
Who is Thomas Solomon?
My knowledge has been honed following 20+ years of running, cycling, hiking, cross-country skiing, lifting, and climbing, 15+ years of academic research at world-leading universities and hospitals, and 10+ years advising and coaching in athletic performance and lifestyle change.
I have a BSc in Biochemistry, a PhD in Exercise Science, and over 90 peer-reviewed publications in medical journals.
I'm also an ACSM-certified Exercise Physiologist (ACSM-EP), an ACSM-certified Personal Trainer (ACSM-CPT), a VDOT-certified Distance Running Coach, and a UKVRN Registered Nutritionist (RNutr).
Since 2002, I’ve conducted biomedical research in exercise and nutrition and have taught and led university courses in exercise physiology, nutrition, biochemistry, and molecular medicine.
And, with my personal experience of competing on the track (800m to 10,000m), the road (5 k to marathon), on the trails, and in the mountains, by foot, bicycle, cross-country ski, and during obstacle course races (OCR), I deeply understand what it's like to train and compete — I've been there, done it, and gotten sweat, mud, and tears on my t-shirt.