
The running science nerd alert.
December 2023
Learn to train smart, run fast, and be strong with Thomas Solomon PhD 



My favourite.


Training methods.
















Supplements.






Recovery (inc. sleep).


Athlete health (inc. mental health).


Injury and rehab.


Female athletes and sex differences.








The primary cause for the large sex difference in athletic performance is exposure to high levels of endogenous testosterone in boys at the onset of puberty (~12 yr) that will rise 30-fold in males but remains low in females. Females, on the other hand, experience the menstrual cycle and monthly fluctuations in endogenous hormones including estradiol, which is important in maintenance of bone mass, skeletal muscle, and tendon protein metabolism. However, estradiol does not have the same anabolic effects as testosterone, which dictates the large sex differences in performance. The effects of the sex steroid hormones, in particular the potent, quick-acting, and long-lasting effects of testosterone, are evident in 1) experiments/studies where sex steroid hormones have been added or suppressed in both males and females, 2) studies of the physiology and performance of individuals with various differences of sex development (DSD), and 3) studies of transgender men and transgender women in response to gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT).
Although it is clear that biologic males outperform biologic females in muscular power, strength, and endurance, primarily due to the potent effects of testosterone, there remain knowledge gaps in our understanding of the sex and gender differences in athletic performance and the training response of males and females across many different events/sports. Table 5 highlights several areas for opportunity and future directions. Many of the acute exercise and training studies are conducted on men, often with the assumption that the effects are similar in women. The suggested future directions in Table 5 are opportunities for high-impact studies, with the goal of providing a more complete understanding of the sex differences in athletic performance and the adaptations associated with training. ”


A meta-analysis of concurrent strength and endurance training in females is premature due to the limited volume of concurrent strength and endurance training research in females. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of such a heterogeneous group of studies may not accurately reflect the efficacy of concurrent strength and endurance training. Likewise, it is difficult to draw strong conclusions or generalizations regarding specific combinations of concurrent strength and endurance training in females, due to the heterogeneous fitness levels, training plans, and training durations presented in the included literature. Indeed, several challenges exist in the area of concurrent strength and endurance training research, as a plethora of training combinations exist (and are constantly added). Different approaches to training may reveal subtle, but meaningful, differences in training responses and adaptations. As such, and based on the included literature, evidence-based modifications to specific exercise prescription for females cannot be made, although it may be suggested the “more important” training mode be completed first when combining strength and endurance into the same session and that concurrent strength and endurance training may be most effective (in recreationally active populations) when performed on separate days. Additional exploration of sport-specific concurrent strength and endurance training, including the upper body, would be useful for practitioners making evidence-based decisions regarding testing and training for some athlete populations. Furthermore, future research about concurrent strength and endurance training in females should consider hormone profiles including menstrual status (energy availability) and hormonal contraceptive use and potentially also the reason for hormonal contraceptive use. ”
And, to help you wash down the latest evidence, here's a snifter from my recent indulgence...







RP(be)E(r) = 7 out of 10.

Access to education is a right, not a privilege:

Every day is a school day.
Empower yourself to train smart.




Disclaimer: I occasionally mention brands and products but it is important to know that I am not affiliated with, sponsored by, an ambassador for, or receiving advertisement royalties from any brands. I have conducted biomedical research for which I have received research money from publicly-funded national research councils and medical charities, and also from private companies, including Novo Nordisk Foundation, AstraZeneca, Amylin, A.P. Møller Foundation, and Augustinus Foundation. I’ve also consulted for Boost Treadmills and Gu Energy on their research and innovation grant applications and I’ve provided research and science writing services for Examine — some of my articles contain links to information provided by Examine but I do not receive any royalties or bonuses from those links. These companies had no control over the research design, data analysis, or publication outcomes of my work. Any recommendations I make are, and always will be, based on my own views and opinions shaped by the evidence available. My recommendations have never and will never be influenced by affiliations, sponsorships, advertisement royalties, etc. The information I provide is not medical advice. Before making any changes to your habits of daily living based on any information I provide, always ensure it is safe for you to do so and consult your doctor if you are unsure.